Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:12:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica osunixxf.c Message-ID: <20030811220728.Q87701@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20030812050118.GA2576@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <200308120456.h7C4ujOb007980@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030812050118.GA2576@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:56:45PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > > njl 2003/08/11 21:56:45 PDT > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: (Branch: INTEL) > > sys/contrib/dev/acpica osunixxf.c > > Log: > > Fix a few more s/UINT32/ACPI_SIZE issues. iasl and acpidb now build on > > ia64. > > Thanks! > > We probably should enable usr.sbin/acpi on ia64. Thoughts? Ah, I was confused for a while. Just for the record, the tinderbox report was on amd64 but ia64 had the same problem though it didn't show up since usr.sbin/acpi is not built on ia64. So my tests and fix done on ia64 work for amd64 too. The whole reason I missed this bug in the first place was because I thought *64 didn't enable builds of usr.sbin/acpi. You can enable it but I haven't finished the fixes to acpidump so it won't work just yet. (I still have to do your sysctl for the address vs. probing memory). acpiconf, iasl, and acpidb should all work though. I'm working on acpidump on the bus and should have it done in a few days. -Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030811220728.Q87701>