Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 08:10:42 +1030 From: Tim Aslat <tim@spyderweb.com.au> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ability for maintainers to update own ports Message-ID: <20031112081042.513ebdc5.tim@spyderweb.com.au> In-Reply-To: <1068458390.38101.19.camel@dirk.no.domain> References: <1068458390.38101.19.camel@dirk.no.domain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the immortal words of Sam Lawrance <boris@brooknet.com.au>... > Pick it to bits, if there are solutions I want to find them :) The biggest problem I can see is that CVS is our biggest limitation. Surely it wouldn't be too hard to add functionality into CVS which would allow per directory r/w permissions on some kind of user/group based authentication. Maybe it's worthwhile investigating a better alternative? Another solution might well be to submit each port/group of ports into it's own module rather than the tree as a whole. Some food for thought. Cheers Tim -- Tim Aslat <tim@spyderweb.com.au> Spyderweb Consulting http://www.spyderweb.com.au P: +61 8 82243020 M: +61 0401088479
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031112081042.513ebdc5.tim>