From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 13 05:46:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F3016A4CF for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 05:46:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4.jp.viruscheck.net (smtp4.jp.viruscheck.net [154.33.69.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC8A43D3F for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 05:46:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bland@freebsd.org) Received: from scan4.jp.viruscheck.net ([154.33.69.39] helo=mail5.jp.viruscheck.net) by smtp4.jp.viruscheck.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1BkG7O-0005et-00; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:46:18 +0900 Received: from [220.221.3.201] (helo=noc.orchid) by mail5.jp.viruscheck.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1BkG7O-0004fD-00; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:46:18 +0900 Received: from [89.60.10.11] (horse.orchid [89.60.10.11]) by noc.orchid (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6D5kHbE066019; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:46:17 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from bland@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <40F37728.4050403@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:46:16 +0900 From: Alexander Nedotsukov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a1) Gecko/20040520 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hidetoshi Shimokawa References: <40E4C710.1040702@FreeBSD.org> <87d63bswig.wl@tora.nunu.org> <40F3474F.8060809@FreeBSD.org> <874qocr5wt.wl@tora.nunu.org> In-Reply-To: <874qocr5wt.wl@tora.nunu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Block noise? when trying to send dv stream to video camera X-BeenThere: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Firewire support in FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 05:46:20 -0000 Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote: Okay. Given what I said bellow does it mean that something broken in -CURRENT i/o sytem? In all situations I did not have any disk i/o activity except fwcontrol process read()s. All the best, Alexander. >For DV, you need to keep about 3MB/s disk I/O all the time. >You may need a dedicated HD drive for a DV file. > >Though it's best to have some feedback mechanism to adjust >timestamps, I have no plan to do so now. > >Latest TI's 1394b chip seems to have some extension for hardware >timestamping for DV packets. I don't know details. > >/\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa >\/ simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp >PGP public key: http://www.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~simokawa/pgp.html > > >At Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:22:07 +0900, >Alexander Nedotsukov wrote: > > >>Hi. It's me again. >>Is someone still care about broken dv upload on -CURRENT here is a small >>addition to all I said before under the topic. Yestarday I was requeired >>to boot up from 5.2.1 live cd and someting :-) pushed me to try >>fwcontrol -S. All I can say it just works. Same machine, same dv file, >>same video camera. >>All the best, >>Alexander. >> >> >>