From owner-freebsd-standards Wed Feb 19 18: 9:52 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FC337B401; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:09:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from espresso.bsdmike.org (espresso.bsdmike.org [65.39.129.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3795243FAF; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:09:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@espresso.bsdmike.org) Received: by espresso.bsdmike.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id A6A399C5B; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 20:57:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 20:57:26 -0500 From: Mike Barcroft To: Tim Robbins Cc: Craig Rodrigues , freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org, kan@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: WCHAR_MIN and WCHAR_MAX not defined in Message-ID: <20030219205726.G61431@espresso.bsdmike.org> References: <20030219223313.GA93707@attbi.com> <20030220112847.A36977@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030220112847.A36977@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>; from tjr@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:28:47AM +1100 Organization: The FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Tim Robbins writes: > I'll add a definition of WCHAR_MIN and WCHAR_MAX to as soon as I > can find a clean (non-polluting) way of doing it. Do we need a with underscored macro variants? Why the specification's authors couldn't keep all the limits in a single header, I'll never know. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message