From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Tue Nov 3 08:07:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13208A253FE; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 08:07:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFDBD1D30; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 08:07:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.22] (210.Red-81-38-187.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [81.38.187.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E272343B98; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 02:07:48 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r400565 - head/security/pam_krb5 To: Cy Schubert References: <201511030457.tA34vkf5040066@slippy.cwsent.com> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, hrs@freebsd.org Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org From: John Marino Message-ID: <56386B51.60301@marino.st> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 09:07:45 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201511030457.tA34vkf5040066@slippy.cwsent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:07:53 -0000 On 11/3/2015 5:57 AM, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <56377C39.5000401@marino.st>, John Marino writes: >> The bottom line is that a regression happened. If the current makefile >> can't be fixed to operate as it was before, the change should be >> reverted, right? > > Actually, it never worked in the first place. That is because the heimdal > port puts its include files in ${LOCALBASE}/include/heimdal (take note of > "heimdal" at the end of the path) and libraries in ${LOCALBASE}/lib/heimdal > (same as above). Ldd ${LOCALBASE}/lib/security/pam_krb5.so makes that > abundantly clear. > > Having said that, it's still no reason or excuse for it not to work. Tested > in a virgin jail, it's working now, and committed. Sorry about the > confusion. I confirm it builds in poudriere now with the heimdal ports option set. Thanks! John