Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:52:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Damian Gerow <damian@sentex.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT [SOLVED] Message-ID: <20030916134953.M9921@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20030916203116.GG66001@sentex.net> References: <20030916115638.U9706@root.org> <20030916201814.GF66001@sentex.net> <20030916131946.W9900@root.org> <20030916203116.GG66001@sentex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Damian Gerow wrote: > Thus spake Nate Lawson (nate@root.org) [16/09/03 16:24]: > > I have no time to track this down but the output of acpidump -t may help > > someone else who might be interested. You're looking for the pointers > > that are stored in RSD PTR. > > I'm still on 5.1-R, and there's no '-t' flag to acpidump. However, I've > posted the dump on the web: > > <http://www.sentex.net/~damian/acpidump>; > > so people can browse as they wish. As expected, your ACPI tables are at the top of physmem: RSDT=0x1fff3000. This is only 52k from 512MB. Something in how MAXMEM affects setup of physical memory is truncating physmem by at least 64k. In short, Don't Do That. -Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030916134953.M9921>