Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 11:39:03 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: David Gilbert <dgilbert@velocet.ca> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can I expect INVARIANTS and VINUM to play well together? Message-ID: <20001121113903.C71779@echunga.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <14873.24814.809777.555306@trooper.velocet.net>; from dgilbert@velocet.ca on Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 12:35:42PM -0500 References: <14873.24814.809777.555306@trooper.velocet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, 20 November 2000 at 12:35:42 -0500, David Gilbert wrote: > Some time ago in stable, I removed INVARIANTS and INVARIANT_SUPPORT > from the kernel because vinum wasn't happy with this configuration. > I've now come back to a point in my debugging that I'd like to turn > these back on, but I need to know if VINUM will be happy with them. It's the first I've heard of it. Do you mean these entries in the kernel config file? # Configuring Vinum into the kernel is not necessary, since the kld # module gets started automatically when vinum(8) starts. This # device is also untested. Use at your own risk. # # see vinum(4) for more reasons not to use these options. pseudo-device vinum #Vinum concat/mirror/raid driver In any case, Vinum was developed with INVARIANTS and INVARIANT_SUPPORT, so I doubt this is your problem. If you do have problems, of course, you should tell me about them. I note that you've had problems with Vinum in the past, but this is the first time you mention INVARIANTS. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001121113903.C71779>