Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 20:58:40 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> Cc: bf1783@gmail.com, sylvio@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 10.0-CUR r226986 && ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp Message-ID: <7989121B-FF1E-4631-BACC-73FED47E7BC1@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20111104032521.GA4093@tinyCurrent> References: <CAGFTUwN82LOFk_NW-E-%2BMuwL9ApsyAb_9y8KtDmhvaOZ6mbhKA@mail.gmail.com> <20111104032521.GA4093@tinyCurrent>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 3, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El d=EDa Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 01:42:50PM -0400, b. f. = escribi=F3: >=20 >> No, it is not the same. You can either masquerade, by setting = UNAME_r >> and OSVERSION, or by editing the headers and scripts that define = them; >> or you can use WITH_FBSD10_FIX for ports that define HAS_CONFIGURE >> (which is implied by USE_AUTOTOOLS and GNU_CONFIGURE). Right now the >> masquerading is probably safer, because there are some problems with >> the fix that are still being resolved -- and a few ports that may = fail >> despite the fix. But of course if you help to test without >> masquerading, these problems will be resolved sooner. >=20 > Well, I will try to help. >=20 > I have set WITH_FBSD10_FIX in /etc/make.conf; the port > ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp installs: >=20 > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h >=20 > with: >=20 > ... > /* define the system type include file here */ > #define NETSNMP_SYSTEM_INCLUDE_FILE "net-snmp/system/freebsd10.h" > ... >=20 > but the named header file is not there: >=20 > # ls -C1 /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/free* > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd2.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd3.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd4.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd5.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd6.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd7.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd8.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd9.h >=20 > I don't know what the correct fix ist, and for the moment I > created 'freebsd10.h' as a copy of 'freebsd9.h': >=20 > # cat freebsd10.h > #include "freebsd9.h" > #define freebsd8 freebsd8 >=20 > +Cc: maintainer You'll need to do more than just that. Take a look at the port history = for more details... -Garrett=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7989121B-FF1E-4631-BACC-73FED47E7BC1>