From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 26 10:11:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C239F37B405 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 10:11:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ticso@mail.cicely.de) Received: from mail.cicely.de (cicely20 [10.1.1.22]) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6QHBFV81267; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 19:11:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by mail.cicely.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f6QHC3n01674; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 19:12:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 19:12:02 +0200 From: Bernd Walter To: Leo Bicknell Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ARP cache problems.... Message-ID: <20010726191202.A1617@cicely20.cicely.de> References: <3B5F8ADE.E75281E6@soekris.com> <20010726100105.A242@cicely20.cicely.de> <20010726113559.A51690@ussenterprise.ufp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010726113559.A51690@ussenterprise.ufp.org>; from bicknell@ufp.org on Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 11:35:59AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 11:35:59AM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:01:05AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > > But there is no reason to put more than one interface on the same hub. > > Simply configure one interface with alias entries. > > s/hub/switch/ and there is, and the system should make this not > too painful to configure. If you are using a switch you should use FEC or VLANs. Yes I know there switches out there without that features but if you want more performance then use hardware that can do the job you need. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message