From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 30 12:07:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA2516A416 for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.176.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A8713C45B for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id kBUC7Mo1037256 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:07:22 +0100 (CET) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.8/8.13.3/Submit) id kBUC7MNi037255; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:07:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:07:22 +0100 From: Divacky Roman To: Scot Hetzel Message-ID: <20061230120722.GA36814@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <790a9fff0612290911t5ae69715gd2bf0dda0f9228f2@mail.gmail.com> <20061229213509.GA86839@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <790a9fff0612291424g4ecbd088i7846d248851b3e63@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0612291424g4ecbd088i7846d248851b3e63@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 147.229.176.14 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linuxolator: amd64 Linux Test Project failures X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:07:26 -0000 > I just added another %p to the format, here are my results with all of > the debugging printfs. > > Dec 29 15:32:38 hp010 kernel: linux(1807): access(Checking if path > [0xffffffffffffffff/0xffffffffa3bc8be0/0x28069000] exists) <- > &args-path, args-path the access03 test passes 0 as the path address. interesting that it gets this non-0 address. is the address consistent among runs? I wonder if glibc mangles it somehow (it shouldnt but you never know) can you try simple program like main() { access(0, 0); } and show its output? roman