From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 18 17:10:02 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDAC16A468;
	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CAE13C447;
	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (mi@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m1IHA2hp079539;
	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:10:02 GMT (envelope-from mi@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from mi@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m1IHA0CL079487;
	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:10:00 GMT (envelope-from mi)
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:10:00 GMT
Message-Id: <200802181710.m1IHA0CL079487@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: mi@aldan.algebra.com, turutani@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp, mi@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: mi@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/120379: devel/icu should be patched
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:10:02 -0000

Synopsis: devel/icu should be patched

State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: mi
State-Changed-When: Mon Feb 18 17:07:42 UTC 2008
State-Changed-Why: 
I just added the patch to the port -- thank you very much for
the pointer.

As for updating the UPDATING -- no, I don't think, this is
warranted. If we were to add an entry to this file every time
a shlib-installing port is updated, it would start growing
too quickly to be useful...

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=120379