Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 08 May 2019 17:17:56 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 234669] devel/upnp: Adds new options; updates to 1.8.4 or prepares port for being used as masterport
Message-ID:  <bug-234669-7788-GfVdlRHYBN@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-234669-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-234669-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234669

--- Comment #14 from Lorenzo Salvadore <phascolarctos@protonmail.ch> ---
I tried to work on bug #237404 and #237409 to fix them, but I think the two
softwares are too old to use upnp branch 1.8.x:

- djmount is more than 10 years old and everytime I fix a problem a new pro=
blem
comes up (and the last one looks to be too big to be solvable without rewri=
ting
much of the source code);
- I am still working on vdr-plugin-upnp; the actual version looks to be qui=
et
difficult to build with upnp 1.8.x, but I have discovered that the port is =
out
of dat, then I will try to update it (but still the last release is from 20=
13).
Moreover, the port is unmaintained: maybe nobody is really interested in it.

As I said, I will keep trying with vdr-plugin-upnp, but I think we have to
possibilities:

1) maintain two ports -- upnp and upnp18 (or upnp16 and upnp)-- as I initia=
lly
suggested, so that we do not lose any port;

2) update the original upnp port to the 1.8.x branch, but this will require
removing from the ports tree those ports that can not be built with the new
branch (djmount and, probably, vdr-multimedia-plugin).

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-234669-7788-GfVdlRHYBN>