Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:48:45 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 Message-ID: <4C89D4CD.7000301@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <4C89663D.5050007@FreeBSD.org> References: <201009081055.o88Atvu8050938@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <AANLkTim4UzWv=jgZcfEO9M=y-Mnp2pxa5jh4foiFZRQO@mail.gmail.com> <20100908130700.GA53378@mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw> <201009081439.o88EdHwh064108@lava.sentex.ca> <4C89663D.5050007@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 10/09/2010 01:57 Doug Barton said the following: > On 9/8/2010 7:39 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote: >> Perhaps as an interim measure a local procmail rule to filter out cvsup >> failures from going to the list ? > > That's a particularly unhelpful response. Not only is it borderline rude to > attempt to shift the responsibility for this to the users, it's a violation of > the robustness principle. My impression that the suggestion was to do the filtering on the sending end, not the recipients' end. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C89D4CD.7000301>