From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 23 06:43:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4513E1065671 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:43:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx23.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1BA8FC28 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 24971 invoked by uid 399); 23 Jun 2008 06:43:27 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 23 Jun 2008 06:43:27 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <485F4609.1050601@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:43:21 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <484F12FE.6000803@FreeBSD.org> <485E9BDF.6090009@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <485E9BDF.6090009@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INDEX build optimizations - please review X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:43:28 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Unfortunately it doesn't DTRT with files terminated with DOS-style CRLF > (e.g. devel/p5-Tie-Restore, others). First, I certainly would not have any problem with a policy that says files in ports shouldn't have CRLF line endings. Second, I am sure we could probably do something about that if we needed to. And Third, I fixed p5-Tie-Restore, along with a whole bunch of others, thanks to Alex Kozlov pointing me in the right direction. :) I really don't care if you use this solution or not, although I would be interested in benchmark results if you chose to give it a try. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection