From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 24 19:36:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE33516A41C for ; Tue, 24 May 2005 19:36:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725C143D1F for ; Tue, 24 May 2005 19:36:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2418A5131A; Tue, 24 May 2005 12:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 12:37:08 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Bohdan Horst Message-ID: <20050524193707.GA11906@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050524193117.GA35326@aristo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050524193117.GA35326@aristo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (nbench results) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 19:36:20 -0000 --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 09:31:17PM +0200, Bohdan Horst wrote: >=20 >=20 > I have 4 identical PC with FreeBSD (2x4.11R and 2x5.4R) >=20 > Results (/usr/ports/net/benchmarks/nbench): >=20 > (CPUTYPE=3Dp3 in /etc/make.conf; portupgrade -vf nbench) >=20 > tests: > NUMERIC SORT: 4.11=3D 499.52 494.31 5.4=3D 451.26 449.7 (4.11 faster)= =20 > STRING SORT: 4.11=3D 24.13 24.11 5.4=3D 25.286 25.294 (5.4 faster) > BITFIELD(e+8) 4.11=3D 1.133 1.1319 5.4=3D 1.1239 1.1239 (4.11 faster) > FP EMULATION 4.11=3D 18.951 18.755 5.4=3D 25.044 25.029 (5.4 faster) > FOURIER 4.11=3D 5361 5356.3 5.4=3D 5076.3 5076.3 (4.11 faster) > ASSIGNMENT 4.11=3D 5.4795 5.4469 5.4=3D 5.8986 5.8968 (5.4 faster) > IDEA 4.11=3D 595.23 592.13 5.4=3D 660.65 660.65 (5.4 faster) > HUFFMAN 4.11=3D 332.47 330.91 5.4=3D 409.06 408.95 (5.4 faster) > NEURAL NET 4.11=3D 7.0374 6.9882 5.4=3D 7.2976 7.2955 (5.4 faster) > LU DECOMP. 4.11=3D 225.94 226.76 5.4=3D 211.56 210.84 (4.11 faster) > original: > INTEGER INDEX 4.11=3D 12.305 12.238 5.4=3D 13.409 13.400 (5.4 faster) > FLOATING-POINT 4.11=3D 9.309 9.296 5.4=3D 9.052 9.041 (4.11 faster) > new: > MEMORY INDEX 4.11=3D 3.321 3.313 5.4=3D 3.448 3.448 (5.4 faster) > INTEGER INDEX 4.11=3D 2.895 2.873 5.4=3D 3.271 3.268 (5.4 faster) > FLOATING-POINT 4.11=3D 5.163 5.156 5.4=3D 5.020 5.014 (4.11 faster) >=20 >=20 >=20 > all 4 hosts have important services (w3cache, firewall, ircd, etc) and i > cannot turn them off to perform good UFS1/UFS2 tests :( Thanks, but if the machines are not completely idle then it's impossible to tell whether these numbers are meaningful :-( Kris --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCk4JjWry0BWjoQKURAh1CAJ4uHhW9zyL0S2M0Rrs73M0bJEBV7ACcCyC7 tH1x+rTpxgkzvpU8kqLK1PM= =XGjI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--