From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 28 19:54:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C136C7DC for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 19:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from babel.karthauser.co.uk (212-13-197-151.karthauser.co.uk [212.13.197.151]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C03649EB for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 19:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Extravariant (host31-48-168-175.range31-48.btcentralplus.com [31.48.168.175]) (Authenticated sender: joemail@tao.org.uk) by babel.karthauser.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83A3522A; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 19:54:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Dr Josef Karthauser To: Warren Block Subject: Re: Creating a bootable ZFS disk? X-Mailer: eMailGanizer Message-ID: ABDBA39F-0B1D-4AC2-8C2A-DC2A0FE05332.goodhumans@emailganizer.goodhumans.com Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 19:54:23 +0000 Reply-To: Dr Josef Karthauser In-Reply-To: References: <1548B1FF-36E2-4AE4-ADD4-3B8872A9DF55@tao.org.uk>, <549EC712.3010909@multiplay.co.uk>, <549EC87C.2010909@multiplay.co.uk>, , , , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" , Steven Hartland X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 19:54:52 -0000 On 28 Dec 2014 at 7:44:29 pm GMT, Warren Block = wrote: =20 > On Sun, 28 Dec 2014, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote: >=20 > > On 27 Dec 2014, at 22:57, Warren Block wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 27 Dec 2014, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote: > >> > >>> I only have 'zfs_load=3D?YES?? in my /boot/loader.conf. I?m hoping = the problem is that I missed the ?-a4k? on the ?gpart add?. I?m starting = again and will report back whether it now works or not! :). > >> > >> Misalignment just makes for slow performance, particularly on = writes. > >> > > > > Ok, fixed. With -a4k is it now booting. Looks like the partitions = weren?t aligned! >=20 > Alignment alone should not have fixed it. While misaligned drives = give poor performance, they should still work. Alas, they weren't. I tried several times with differing pool = configurations. Joe