From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 14 23:51:03 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA11259 for current-outgoing; Thu, 14 Mar 1996 23:51:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from onyx.nervosa.com (root@nervosa.com [192.187.228.86]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA11247 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 1996 23:50:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from onyx.nervosa.com (coredump@onyx.nervosa.com [10.0.0.1]) by onyx.nervosa.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA01758; Thu, 14 Mar 1996 23:50:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 23:50:39 -0800 (PST) From: invalid opcode To: "matthew c. mead" cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -current and accelx In-Reply-To: <199603150439.XAA02267@neon.Glock.COM> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 14 Mar 1996, matthew c. mead wrote: > Well, I upgraded to -current yesterday, and things seem to be > going ok other than the fact that whenever I try to start up > accelerated X, it hangs the machine. XF86_S3 works just fine, > however. Any ideas? Thanks! > Matthew C. Mead On a similar note, I notice XFree86 will run for about 10 mins and than the entire system will freeze. You can ctrl-c out of things, but than you can't run anything after that, it just hangs there excepting terminal input, but doing nothing with it. Other than that, -current is pretty stable as I can see. == Chris Layne ======================================== Nervosa Computing == == coredump@nervosa.com ================ http://www.nervosa.com/~coredump ==