From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 18 01:38:31 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3142FE06
 for <net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 01:38:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com (mail-la0-x233.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::233])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5023665
 for <net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 01:38:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id mc6so2067706lab.24
 for <net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:38:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=4KcpcaQXkxTsMPmdOaVRkmw1/kaflRQLU8LovjNY8Xc=;
 b=tBoylUUPzDg9NUVLyw3zHFwv9JGfCgo8oN/lU3EwBER4h0i/cWmSFSOrp8EJRfKXmH
 q3Az0/539DeOSQakjOwP37zINCeRMKDqRG3Jvf89OLUfnkxOsL7je0FePeTDlX1RGtCz
 Z1H8X5+srp9n4JqnDAXMvNJvemBIuQ6Kj4xBikF3f5IqBKl2zqIuzhKfV+j/hVhguA2x
 H2mpRLkJxx4SasDwsrFaiEmAH+WwLkV4H0X0CorW8DepUgmn5nVeZ8KN5S/dGhznIxr5
 E8AtaEEgTt4koWX1pB7mh/n9x21nsv5VKlbmtki4NM7U6kQREsQAFUAjywYspBg52gOi
 e6Tw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.29.41 with SMTP id g9mr14860878lah.83.1416274708622;
 Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:38:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.99.36 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:38:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20141117193354.T31139@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
References: <CAD3kpuU8jQjMdfEiGNwYLToJDSZWGbJgQTzGeAFEw1UBLY4M3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141117193354.T31139@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:38:28 +0800
Message-ID: <CAD3kpuX8ruHA+nqGNp6vhLJdCpBv1M_G1OS+CROXU8te9kUF8w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: dragonflybsd's ipfw
From: Sato Kentney <satokentney@gmail.com>
To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1
Cc: FreeBSD Net <net@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 01:38:31 -0000

i agree,
i am not good in english as networking administor from Tokyo.
but when i read the page, i see that the main idea is so call "modular
design" and there is a long way to catch up the freebsd's ipfw

anyway, i dont think it can compare to freebsd's ipfw, as Smith said their
ipfw is the version without in-kernel NAT and tables .all these important
features

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:48:13 +0800, Sato Kentney wrote:
>
>  > I saw a email in dragonflybsd email list, someone is doing this!
>  > http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/ipfw2/
>
> We've had 'ipfw2' for a very long while.  I couldn't help wondering why
> DF wouldn't just import our many years of development and experience
> rather than using bycn82's 'rewrite'? .. but DF already has ipfw2:
>
> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/cgi/web-man?command=3Dipfw&section=3DANY
>
> man page dated October 2008.  Before tables, in-kernel NAT, later
> dummynet updates and no doubt more.  So why not start from there?
>
> cheers, Ian
>



--=20
=E3=81=82=E3=82=8A=E3=81=8C=E3=81=A8=E3=81=86
=E4=BD=90=E8=97=A4=E6=9F=AF=E5=BE=B7
Sato K.