From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 7 16:48:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98843140; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 16:48:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310396A6; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 16:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.80.1) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1UDdzZ-0003jF-4W>; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:48:29 +0100 Received: from e178002083.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.2.83] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.80.1) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1UDdzZ-000saw-0v>; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:48:29 +0100 Message-ID: <5138C4DC.9030209@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:48:28 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130220 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Smirnoff Subject: Re: IPFW in CURRENT: SMP-friendly? References: <51388897.4080102@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20130307154828.GG48089@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130307154828.GG48089@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2XRGXFEGEIOABPLMTPDMK" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.2.83 Cc: Current FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 16:48:30 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2XRGXFEGEIOABPLMTPDMK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 03/07/13 16:48, schrieb Gleb Smirnoff: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:31:19PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > O> There is work going on to move the OpenBSD pf(1) towards a more SMP > O> friendly entity - this reduces CPU load and should raise throughput.= > O>=20 > O> Are there any plans for FreeBSD "native" packet filter IPFW2 to gain= the > O> same? Or, to ask it differently, IS ipfw(1), the freeBSD native > O> packetfilter, already SMP friendly and so better suited for multicor= e > O> architectures? >=20 > Yes, it is already not under a single lock for a long time. >=20 Thank you very much. Regards, Oliver ------enig2XRGXFEGEIOABPLMTPDMK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJROMTcAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N88vMIANRd3hErD612zGb5REQOBzjB zYI1gNGHEt/sE0H7KcX7wyqTZtFa9KlJ+fdVLz49roYwbYi9ERZugftEFZtIHIgH 2wik9ATWpXDCeDfnyTpIJCXF5z8t7HMXVgaKy599SiGShIdV68pCUVpm/mOSl+NR rN+HV/Xml6xBebDCLR+8nod37kAjLu4EVTdS2itpPGvbzRl7Npsq8iCpL/8Acar0 pLVdmg1wlKm/GbIc3vLsyrPBnp8FlNvrJnW134eeUWTiTtvdx32utTbi3znfnJ65 wR/YqGduJKHog+tf6bWluxejz/Mtf/VOd01y0yxJTfarJtJMWtM2LVhp+4s3emw= =4Rpm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2XRGXFEGEIOABPLMTPDMK--