Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 14:32:54 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: will@physics.purdue.edu, mwm@mired.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Message-ID: <54603.976401174@winston.osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: Message from sthaug@nethelp.no of "Sat, 09 Dec 2000 20:28:07 %2B0100." <75351.976390087@verdi.nethelp.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Not likely to happen - people have an investment in the current scheme and it would certainly mess with their heads if one day FreeBSD suddenly started doing something entirely different than what it's been doing for the last 7 years. For those who really want to track the NetBSD way of doing things, it can be set according to their own tastes. - Jordan > > > Agreed. It would be nice if FreeBSD could use the same system as NetBSD, > > > storing the packages/ports under /usr/pkg. > > > > That's why PREFIX exists. > > Okay, let me rephrase: It would be nice if FreeBSD *by default* stored > the packages/ports under /usr/pkg, like NetBSD (and the corresponding > sources under /usr/pkgsrc). > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54603.976401174>