From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Feb 12 9:31: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from tungsten.btinternet.com (tungsten.btinternet.com [194.73.73.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C0B37B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:30:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [213.123.132.55] (helo=computer) by tungsten.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.03 #83) id 14SMoK-0004uq-00; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:30:48 +0000 From: "Dominic Marks" To: "Chris Hill" , "Dave VanAuken" Cc: Subject: RE: Win2k, FreeBSD, Small Home Network, Router Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:30:03 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks to you both, I'll check that out and report back. Dominic Marks -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Chris Hill Sent: 12 February 2001 16:43 To: Dominic Marks; Dave VanAuken Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Win2k, FreeBSD, Small Home Network, Router On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Dave VanAuken wrote: > perhaps my ignorance here... i believe 192.X is routable, you should > be using 192.168.X.X or 10.X.X.X as your IP addresses for internal > non-routable. Yes, that's correct. There's also a third one you can use, whose numbers I forget. See RFC1918. > check your netmasks on both... same? That was my first thought. What I'm using is 192.168.1.x, with all netmasks set to 255.255.255.0. It seems that (some parts of) WinDoze didn't know what to do with a "class B" network, but once I made it "class C" everyone was happy. Sorry for the archaic terminology. > what about domain name? Shouldn't matter, as long as you're pinging by IP rather than by name. > assuming your are trying to ping rather than establish some other sort > of connection (samba) which may be the source of other ocnfiguration > problems. Yes. I've found TCP/IP is *much* easier to get working than Samba, so get TCP/IP set up first. One step at a time. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Dominic Marks > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 11:16 AM > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Win2k, FreeBSD, Small Home Network, Router [major snippage] > I now have working network cards in both my Win2k box and my FreeBSD > Next step: Getting them to connect. I haven't been able to establish a > connection between the two boxes in this way (tried pinging Win2k from > FreeBSD and FreeBSD from Win2k, no luck). -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy expunging <-> ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message