From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Sep 5 9:28: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BA337B424; Tue, 5 Sep 2000 09:27:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zeppo.feral.com (IDENT:mjacob@zeppo [192.67.166.71]) by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA18936; Tue, 5 Sep 2000 09:27:55 -0700 Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 09:24:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Will Andrews Cc: sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/21058: nwclient port installs manpages into wrong directory In-Reply-To: <20000905111909.R23702@radon.gryphonsoft.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 08:39:06AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > Question: What's the MFC policy for ports? If I fix something in top of tree > > for ports, is it expected to make it back to, (e.g.), RELEASE_4_1_0? > > Ports do not use branches. That changed about two years ago. Hence, > there is no "MFC policy". Good enough. There actually *are* tags, but I'll assume that they're more 'freeze points' than anything else. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message