From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jul 2 14:20:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2A337BB62 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 14:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gyros.marcuscom.com (dhcp-64-102-60-35.cisco.com [64.102.60.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2494D43E42 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 14:17:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from gyros.marcuscom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gyros.marcuscom.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g62LH6kX001058; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:17:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: (from marcus@localhost) by gyros.marcuscom.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g62LH5gq001057; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:17:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: gyros.marcuscom.com: marcus set sender to marcus@marcuscom.com using -f Subject: Re: KSE status report From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Julian Elischer Cc: Wesley Morgan , iedowse@maths.tcd.ie, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Date: 02 Jul 2002 17:17:05 -0400 Message-Id: <1025644625.320.105.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 16:07, Julian Elischer wrote: > ok, so you are saying that GNOME stuff works fine? > What do yuo have running and is there still anything that does the wrong > thing? I just did an update of -CURRENT about 4 hours ago, and everything in GNOME works fine except nautilus. Nautilus hangs indefinitely taking up almost all of the CPU. Once it's killed, other GNOME apps respond again. This is -CURRENT kernel+world minus your recent queue.h commit. I can get a back trace if you'd like. Joe > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Wesley Morgan wrote: > > > After reading this... I got to thinking, and I copied the old headers into > > the wrong place. After rebuilding, it works fine :)... That's what I get > > for doing it at 2am! My fault, you guys could have fixed this almost > > immediately except for some bad info from me. > > > Good idea. > > > > > > Unforunatly someone tried to complie a libc_r with the old queue.h and > > > it had the same problem (or so they said). > > > > > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Ian Dowse wrote: > > > > > >> In message > > >> , Ju > > >> lian Elischer writes: > > >> >The big problem at the moment is that something in the > > >> >source tree as a whole, and probably something that came in with KSE > > >> >is stopping us from successfully compiling a working libc_r. > > >> >(a bit ironic really). > > >> > > >> Is the new > > >> > > >> (elm)->field.tqe_next = (void *)-1; > > >> > > >> in TAILQ_REMOVE a likely candidate? That could easily tickle old bugs > > >> in other code. The libc_r code does use a lot of TAILQ macros. > > >> > > >> Ian > > >> > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message