From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct  8 01:06:04 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63533ED9;
 Tue,  8 Oct 2013 01:06:04 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca)
Received: from orthanc.ca (orthanc.ca [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:8200::42])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23FE123BA;
 Tue,  8 Oct 2013 01:06:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.42.129] (d66-183-220-167.bchsia.telus.net
 [66.183.220.167] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)
 by orthanc.ca (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r98160gN025917
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
 Mon, 7 Oct 2013 18:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: rcs is gone?
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
In-Reply-To: <1381193888.1130.42.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 18:05:59 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7C8EB71B-DBA4-49F3-80F4-D579A596A540@orthanc.ca>
References: <29D748F4-5E38-4587-BC7F-0141234C2F62@orthanc.ca>
 <F9A84DDF-EC24-42F2-9B34-F5041946293D@orthanc.ca>
 <EBF54472-4DF9-42AB-9577-B7CEFFFFFA1E@orthanc.ca>
 <6CEFF9B8-A62A-4616-A0FF-BDDDE1027A7E@FreeBSD.org>
 <132C8A43-E822-49C3-A1EA-493A40449AD4@orthanc.ca>
 <AF6F14E9-FBF0-42C6-AE19-3449556E8921@orthanc.ca>
 <CAJ-Vmo=PrgLWj2TiD8L8g7cx13yzrBYwA8Wt+3mVRCRS8f7YXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <525347DD.5090702@freebsd.org>
 <CAJ-VmomQsNWo7ahj_3xveWkU_nzqKeezt76z44qi30ua7pLu-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <1381193888.1130.42.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
To: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 01:06:04 -0000


On 2013-10-07, at 5:58 PM, Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> I have not re-read those threads to see just how much of the =
discussion
> involved rcs, I just spot-checked a few and confirmed my memory that =
it
> showed up in some of the messages there.

I don't see any discussion as to why the code (CVS, in this case) =
*needs* to be removed.

What, in the current builds of 10.x, is broken by leaving RCS/CVS in =
place?  And what, as 10.x moves forward towards a public release, will =
be broken by leaving this code in the base?