Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 01:17:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Sung Nae Cho <sucho2@quasar.phys.vt.edu> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Okay! Accept my sincerely apology. Didn't see that from handbook. Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107250113540.20128-100000@quasar.phys.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <20010724220019S.jkh@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Okay, I apologize to all FreeBSD users. I wasn't aware of the posting rule in handbook. Once again, my sincerely apology goes to you all. "The topic of any posting should adhere to the basic charter of the list it is posted to, e.g. if the list is about technical issues then your posting should contain technical discussion. Ongoing irrelevant chatter or flaming only detracts from the value of the mailing list for everyone on it and will not be tolerated." Sung N. Cho On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > OK, sorry, but play time is over and it's time for you to take your > pill and return to your room for the night. These nice men will help > you on with your special jacket so you don't hurt yourself again, OK? > You hear me Sung? Yes, I know about the voices telling you to post > these messages, I do, but we've been over all that BEFORE Sung! Bad > Sung! You know what happens when you post bad thoughts to the mailing > lists, remember? It's in the handbook charters we read every morning > when we get up, isn't it Sung? Can you tell me what those rules are? > Come on Sung, we know those rules don't we? Yes we do, we read them > in the handbook, can we say them now? Very good, let's say them > together: > > "The topic of any posting should adhere to the basic charter of the > list it is posted to, e.g. if the list is about technical issues then > your posting should contain technical discussion. Ongoing irrelevant > chatter or flaming only detracts from the value of the mailing list > for everyone on it and will not be tolerated." > > Now Sung, you know these rules and you know what the nice men have to > do when you don't follow them, don't you? Yes, they have to insist. > We don't like it when they have to insist, do we Sung? No we don't. > We don't like it at all. We don't let you post to the mailing lists > anymore when that happens, do we Sung? That's right. We have to ban > Sung. Be a good Sung and stay away from the mailing lists when the > voices are telling you bad things, just like we told you, OK Sung? > The nice men don't want to have to insist. Good Sung! The nice > men will take you to your room now, go with them. That's right. > Bye bye Sung! > > [Whew! Thank god for Lithium and sendmail access lists, that's > all I've got to say!] > > From: Sung Nae Cho <sucho2@quasar.phys.vt.edu> > Subject: Bullshit! Mac OS X is not FreeBSD. Get real please. > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:36:06 -0400 (EDT) > > > Okay, don't give me crap like I'm troll or anything stupid for I'm FreeBSD > > user. But, I think there is a double standards in BSD community. First > > of all, MAC OS X is not FreeBSD. How can it be a FreeBSD if it has > > totally different core except that it has a FreeBSD user land commands? > > Or, have I heard this wrong? 2nd, I personally don't see the difference > > between APPLE and MICROSOFT. At least Microsoft doesn't pretend to be > > friends with Open Sourced Community. APPLE is bullshit company. It > > builds an OS based on Open Source and they're making it a proprietary. > > That's bullshit! 3rd, OS X is a one crappy OS I've ever seen! Infact, > > most APPLE users have gone back to OS 9 because OS X requires them to buy > > all the softwares (Office suites...etc) built for OS X since the emulation > > is terrible and utterally useless (TOO DAMN SLOW!). > > > > It's also bullshit that FreeBSD community cannot throw away it's pride and > > accept the defeat and try to learn from it. We all heard that in recent > > benchmark, both Linux 2.4 and Windows 2000 kick FreeBSD butt in > > performance. FreeBSDers complained so they did the test again with all > > the optimizations enabled and FreeBSD still couldn't beat both Windows > > 2000 and Linux 2.4 (not to mention, Linux 2.4 and Win 2000 didn't even > > receive special treat for getting tuned.) Come one people! Let's cut the > > bull shit and get real. I'm sick of this idiots just saying this and that > > without actually contributing anything to FreeBSD development. I hope > > FreeBSD 5.x does a milestone just like Linux 2.4 and Windows 2000 did. > > Also, don't give me the crap like Windows 2000 and Linux are unstable! > > I've tried em and Windows 2000 is a totally different beast than any > > previous Windows (2000 is stable as a rock!). So is Linux. Linux 2.4 is > > even stabler! > > > > Why then do I use FreeBSD? I use FreeBSD not because it's better than > > Linux or Windows 2000, not because it has better hardware support than > > Linux or Windows, but just because I like the consistent layout of the > > file structures. Redhat seems to move around files on every release. > > Also, ports collections seem to be handy when I'm not in mood to compile > > manually (not that I can't do it in Linux). I wish FreeBSD 5.x finally > > get support for my new Kensington USB (OPTICAL) mouse on my Laptop! I > > don't know about FreeBSD hardware support on desktops, but laptop hardware > > support is simply not impressive! I'm not about to go back to wheel based mouse > > (got tired of cleaning wheels). > > > > I hope this doesn't offend anyone. (Just got tired of listening to crap!) > > > > Sung N. Cho > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.33.0107250113540.20128-100000>