Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 15:39:18 -0700 From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> To: dive <dive@ender.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should IPFilter be pulled from FreeBSD as well Message-ID: <200105302240.f4UMe1J18763@cwsys.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 30 May 2001 13:48:00 PDT." <20010530134800.A24208@dragon.ender.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010530134800.A24208@dragon.ender.com>, dive writes: > I'm in favor of keeping ipf in the base system, since the base system is (und > erstandably) > watched a lot more closely for bugs and generally things tend to get fixed in > the base > more quickly (such as the recent fragmentation issue in ipfilter) > I use ipfilter / ipnat in favor of ipfw/natd, since ipnat greatly outperforms > natd in my I raised this issue on -arch when it was discussed to move some software from the base system to ports. I was told that ports are maintained to the same standard as the base FreeBSD. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105302240.f4UMe1J18763>