From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 07:00:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0B516A4B3; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 07:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.reppep.com (www.reppep.com [66.92.104.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C638543FBD; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 07:00:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pepper@reppep.com) Received: from [129.85.219.160] (salt.rockefeller.edu [129.85.219.160]) by www.reppep.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8CDFE4B; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:00:38 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: pepper@mail.reppep.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3F6A98F3.7080801@freebsd.org> References: <3F6A98F3.7080801@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:59:02 -0400 To: Scott Long From: Chris Pepper Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.9 stability update X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:00:14 -0000 At 11:49 PM -0600 2003/09/18, Scott Long wrote: >All, > >We'd like to get a new poll on the stability and readiness of 4.9. The >belief is that the last of the PAE-induced instability was resolved on >August 31. Is anyone still experiencing unusual crashes, corruption, >etc, on a system that is running with up-to-date sources? Now is the >time to speak up and get the problems resolved so that we can make the >deadline by next weekend. Any new testing would be highly appreciated, >especially in reduced-memory configurations and of course >4GB PAE >configurations. No problems with stability, although I have a USB problem that prevents booting with devices attached . I'd suggest putting it in the release notes if anyone else can reproduce. Chris Pepper -- Chris Pepper: Rockefeller University: