Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 16:48:56 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Chris Csanady <cc@137.org> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threads goals version III Message-ID: <38252EE8.5F627E51@newsguy.com> References: <199911052339.QAA09960@usr06.primenet.com> <3823EE8E.EC50A1BD@newsguy.com> <3824E2A5.D08C3158@ameslab.gov>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris Csanady wrote: > > I don't see the problem. So, you ask for two quantum--they will end > up being on the same CPU in this case. They may still be scheduled in > different classes as you please. > > The idea is that you don't want to do this in general, because you > have more context switches than necessary, and increased process > migration. Asking for the same number of quanta as CPU's is simply > the optimal case. > > Or, at least that is how I understand it.. /me mmmms Let's see what Terry says. What you describe makes sense, but he won't be able to use so few words. :-) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org What y'all wanna do? Wanna be hackers? Code crackers? Slackers Wastin' time with all the chatroom yakkers? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38252EE8.5F627E51>