From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 20:35:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A271065670 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:35:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grarpamp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D528FC14 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so2655862wib.13 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:35:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6/XWJn3vdmxhZB68S2TIQ8nsvzcLfhcD+6Q0PsFtpR4=; b=dOGTUNpR8IppEGWiIzqo4MGG2XisLSZnY3Hq6Q+uFQQSp7DZVS9E59xWrY7MyKUX5E r73A1ADBvWv3Ar34q0qIBnjp5OlqftR6zS06HZqDWANWVd2k9v7Qu9sCeBGPUv4zoSU3 A0iFx1pqs0F9t/s7gBualCMXzgIMkzeNyedMi9+0jv3MUcRvPEqIr7G/VbeV1T9DmpVi Tv7Tf7DI/nAUiE9ISqSLzX9aQBY5o+K5zB/OFPANsKQgaaZr9ZrHvuDUTA8dQv8OdPAV wMklj0SuCgTpTTQMJHo4TkklDPJiLn1mHMQ/Q++SmIjmfO7aUV3oHyO7ioDPKlVfxyq8 MibQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.133.234 with SMTP id q84mr2388715wei.102.1331757355947; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.102.6 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:35:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <97c592043bf97ec52552d9ea20669b7d@bluelife.at> References: <97c592043bf97ec52552d9ea20669b7d@bluelife.at> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:35:55 -0400 Message-ID: From: grarpamp To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: VirtualBox missing from pkg FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:35:57 -0000 > Is it that 4.1.10 was released less than 24h ago and the ports > are not updated yet? Not at all, just an inventory. Lag time on new releases is totally understandable. They need ported and tested. And life is first priority :) > Is it because 4.1.8 packages for 8-stable are not available? Using the packages-major-stable example for 8 and 9, we have this FTP index. Notably, RELENG_8 i386 is missing the base 'virtualbox-ose' package. I think it used to be there last month. 8sa: 69174652 Mar 08 02:43 virtualbox-ose-4.1.8.tbz 8sa: 1039991 Mar 08 22:58 virtualbox-ose-additions-4.1.8.tbz 8sa: 110285 Mar 07 22:13 virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.8_1.tbz 8sa: 107500 Mar 08 02:12 virtualbox-ose-kmod-legacy-4.0.16.tbz 8si: 953365 Feb 29 14:33 virtualbox-ose-additions-4.1.8.tbz 8si: 109301 Feb 28 20:41 virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.8_1.tbz 8si: 106336 Feb 29 01:05 virtualbox-ose-kmod-legacy-4.0.16.tbz 9sa: 69315786 Mar 05 22:56 virtualbox-ose-4.1.8.tbz 9sa: 1062649 Mar 06 09:15 virtualbox-ose-additions-4.1.8.tbz 9sa: 110743 Mar 05 17:46 virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.8_1.tbz 9sa: 108026 Mar 05 22:33 virtualbox-ose-kmod-legacy-4.0.16.tbz 9si: 64462589 Feb 08 10:42 virtualbox-ose-4.0.14.tbz 9si: 1052081 Feb 09 06:06 virtualbox-ose-additions-4.0.14.tbz 9si: 106199 Jan 30 18:51 virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.0.14.tbz 9si: 96474 Jan 30 20:32 virtualbox-ose-kmod-legacy-3.2.12_3.tbz 9si: 53094010 Feb 09 07:13 virtualbox-ose-legacy-3.2.12_3.tbz > Is it because the packages are not identical to the current ports? The svn port -> FTP building process is presumed to have some delay. Likely because, even though parallelism might yield a complete build of all ports in a few days, it is surely and rightly checkpointed by humans to prevent automated mayhem :)