From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Wed Apr 11 14:30:07 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824F8F98CDD
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:30:07 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from m.muenz@spam-fetish.org)
Received: from mailout-02.maxonline.de (mailout-02.maxonline.de [81.24.66.23])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256
 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E1858236D
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:30:06 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from m.muenz@spam-fetish.org)
Received: from web03-01.max-it.de (web03-01.max-it.de [81.24.64.215])
 by mailout-02.maxonline.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB2E019
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:29:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by web03-01.max-it.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6E328B87E
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:29:58 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at web03-01.max-it.de
Received: from web03-01.max-it.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (web03-01.max-it.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id 28SbCUDGi_mq for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:29:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [81.24.66.132] (unknown [81.24.66.132])
 (Authenticated sender: m.muenz@spam-fetish.org)
 by web03-01.max-it.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A49AB28A03F
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:29:58 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Support for Dual NIC
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
References: <CAM_1nP3--4Eunr=o9tN3dFmrL0gr0Cydr3AxXSNJPxmDaTZk8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <cd2d419c-5ddc-ee5c-e8b3-d791058624ab@spam-fetish.org>
From: "Muenz, Michael" <m.muenz@spam-fetish.org>
Message-ID: <04125f40-6388-f074-d935-ce6c16d220fa@spam-fetish.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:29:57 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <cd2d419c-5ddc-ee5c-e8b3-d791058624ab@spam-fetish.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:30:07 -0000

Am 07.04.2018 um 22:52 schrieb Muenz, Michael:
> Am 07.04.2018 um 20:15 schrieb Ralston Champagnie:
>> Hello Guys,
>>
>> Netmap natively support only the four ports NIC doesn't make sense whe=
n
>> considering that dual NIC has the same exact chipset as the quad ones.=
..
>>
>> Is there a patch available? Noticed problems with pictures or videos=20
>> such
>> as this with the dual (mine: Intel 82575) and IPS with lots of memory =
-
>> 196.115874 [1071] netmap_grab_packets=C2=A0=C2=A0 bad pkt at 445 1en 2=
164
>>
>>
>> Kind regards, Ralston
> Hm, that might be the reason why my Intel X710 Dual SFP+ doesn't work=20
> when
> running Suricata with IPS / netmap.
>

I replaced with an old X520 DA Dual SFP+ and it works. X520 is ix and=20
X710 ixl
but no idea if it's diver related.


Michael