From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 28 19:23:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DD0106566B for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:23:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C298FC08 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so3201771wwc.31 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:23:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pY0I7lnGP/OK10s/+TWK426oqdQAmq3fD9hm2k2AKE0=; b=ipeLsSVvodfCTyPK6TstfVUsq+XCO4+YhHcVgfJqpr+O9q0Ro0L+YAXK6hGkQCAUay dJXxIp1s78s2zRRV70vyB0MYlmlkSM0bhhjGZQipWy7JA4RNinEsPFy+r4xfnhQ5SFmi 54XwPcDhJLxLgLGw9tjS2SleLVroQ8dp3//Ac= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; b=OsSZurteB/6sUBU+mvSoTrBQHYMa/iiVNdHek6cmCmjqYNhAIuiJEF9nVe5zK5labE xIJdVnmwPUN+99vA3If04cLZYE85WUrkr9u7QmkwOdPlhcAWzEgO0oTJoYp0jhXAn69+ ivKWiJlQs69M8W654J3GXxq1BjtX0eSFg0tOg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.142.224 with SMTP id i74mr4321095wej.3.1304018626932; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.243.143 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.243.143 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:23:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110428190745.GE77343@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> References: <4DB7B237.7000603@marino.st> <20110427075436.70ae18ac@seibercom.net> <4DB96EC9.8000506@FreeBSD.org> <20110428190745.GE77343@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:23:46 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: How are [MAINTAINER] patches handled and why aren't PRs FIFO? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:23:48 -0000 On 28 Apr 2011 20:08, "Chip Camden" wrote: > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but as I understand it committers have commit > privilege for all ports. What if certain qualified port maintainers who > aren't committers were nevertheless given commit access for only the leaf > ports that they maintain? Wouldn't that speed up the overall process? > Search the archives for an answer or ten. Chris