From owner-cvs-all Sun Jan 28 10:58:41 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396E637B400; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:58:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from beppo (beppo [192.67.166.79]) by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA02193; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:57:43 -0800 Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:57:44 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: John Baldwin , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Nope. lmdd of=file in this /tmp got me: panic: lockmgr: pid 78175, not exclusive lock holder 5 unlocking panic Stopped at Debugger+0x2c: ldq ra,0(sp) <0xfffffe000a2576a0> db> t Debugger() at Debugger+0x2c panic() at panic+0x100 lockmgr() at lockmgr+0x534 brelse() at brelse+0xa20 bufdone() at bufdone+0x4a0 bufdonebio() at bufdonebio+0x1c swap_pager_strategy() at swap_pager_strategy+0x114 vm_pager_strategy() at vm_pager_strategy+0x40 mdstart_swap() at mdstart_swap+0x11c mdstrategy() at mdstrategy+0x128 diskstrategy() at diskstrategy+0x150 spec_strategy() at spec_strategy+0x224 spec_vnoperate() at spec_vnoperate+0x2c ufs_strategy() at ufs_strategy+0x140 ufs_vnoperate() at ufs_vnoperate+0x2c bwrite() at bwrite+0x390 vop_stdbwrite() at vop_stdbwrite+0x1c vop_defaultop() at vop_defaultop+0x2c ufs_vnoperate() at ufs_vnoperate+0x2c bawrite() at bawrite+0x48 cluster_wbuild() at cluster_wbuild+0x6a8 cluster_write() at cluster_write+0x438 ffs_write() at ffs_write+0x500 vn_write() at vn_write+0x21c dofilewrite() at dofilewrite+0x130 write() at write+0x5c syscall() at syscall+0x2d4 XentSys1() at XentSys1+0x10 db> Maybe the 'mount -o async' is the culprit. Hmm. Never had this kind of trouble with MFS..... On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > >> One should use md(4) and mdconfig(8) rather than MFS nowadays anyways, which > > >> does work with DEVFS. > > > > > >Uh, I don't think so. MFS should be fixed. With MFS you should be able to take > > >advantage of VM. I don't think the same applies to md. > > > > Try it, and come back with numbers if you think it is worse... > > Can't really compare right now, now can I, if MFS is broken ... :-)... > > But seriously, I'll be using md a lot from now on and I'll let you know if it > seems broken.... Like I said in other mail (paraphrasing) "Seems like this > ought to be a VFS, but I don't really care" > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message