Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 21:05:33 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Ryan Dooley <ryan@third-man.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recommendations on the newfs of a 1.0TB fs... Message-ID: <xzp8ywx6sfm.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org> (Ryan Dooley's message of "Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:48:28 -0800") References: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ryan Dooley <ryan@third-man.com> writes: > When I initally created the file system, the options I set are: block size of > 65536 and a fragsize of 8192. How many cylinder groups? > This has worked out for me in the past but now that the fs is more than 50% > in use, the fsck's (it's a -STABLE system) are taking about an hour to complete. The question is, why does it need fsck'ing in the first place? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp8ywx6sfm.fsf>