From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 11 22:54:30 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA03657 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 22:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA03617 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 22:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id WAA00669; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 22:49:04 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199607120549.WAA00669@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Kernel Config (Was: GENERIC Kernel Debate) To: mrm@MARMOT.Mole.ORG (M.R.Murphy) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 22:49:03 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.freebsd.org, sextonr.crestvie@squared.com In-Reply-To: <199607111546.IAA04439@meerkat.mole.org> from "M.R.Murphy" at Jul 11, 96 08:46:26 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I think we all ultimately want the all-singing, all-dancing loadable > > kernel modules with PnP detection and auto config of devices while > > simultaneously selecting proper drivers for compatible hardware while > > working around all known incompatibilites. > > Not all of us do. At least one of us wants a really fast, really reliable > system that makes extremely efficient use of its hardware environment. I > suspect that that's not quite compatible with all-singing, all-dancing. > Maybe, but I'm sceptical. What in particular are you skeptical about? Maybe I can allay some of your fears... Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.