From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 02:02:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195D5700 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu (wollman-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:ccb::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A3DD04 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1M22Vfc049458; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:02:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.14.5/8.14.4/Submit) id r1M22VQW049457; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:02:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:02:31 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <201302220202.r1M22VQW049457@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> To: jdc@koitsu.org Subject: Re: IPMI serial console In-Reply-To: <20130221233838.GB92249@icarus.home.lan> References: <00CC60B5-A6EB-4A3C-B8AC-1D60014DE442@gsoft.com.au> <201302211049.13863.jhb@freebsd.org> <20130221220317.GA90640@icarus.home.lan> Organization: none X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (hergotha.csail.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:02:31 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hergotha.csail.mit.edu Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:02:33 -0000 In article <20130221233838.GB92249@icarus.home.lan>, jdc@koitsu.org writes: >Wow, that's disappointing. I wonder if the underlying IPMI firmware has >a bug relating to using serial port speeds other than 115200. The bug may be in the BIOS where it claims you can select some other speed. Certainly none of the Dell iDRAC systems I've ever seen support anything other than 115.2, despite there being a speed setting in the BIOS. But we're building a custom OS image anyway, so it was no hardship to put that into /boot. -GAWollman