From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 11 05:25:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D3E1065675; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:25:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ade@FreeBSD.org) Received: from panix.lovett.com (panix.lovett.com [166.84.7.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F033C8FC12; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cpe-66-68-128-204.austin.res.rr.com ([66.68.128.204] helo=[172.16.32.150]) by panix.lovett.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.73 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Pxuqs-0009fZ-9l; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:25:26 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ade Lovett In-Reply-To: <4D799EC9.2090304@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:25:14 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <488C7790-D3E2-4441-BEC8-DD26D8917181@freebsd.org> <4D792578.6000303@FreeBSD.org> <2B21F26B-D7EA-480B-BFA2-BD12DDDB7721@FreeBSD.org> <4D7932AC.1020508@FreeBSD.org> <883EDE8E-309A-497B-A9ED-2350AC1D2546@FreeBSD.org> <20110310235432.GA11144@lonesome.com> <4D796857.1020305@FreeBSD.org> <1150BA48-1B1D-4C8E-9059-ADF5CE2C494C@FreeBSD.org> <4D799EC9.2090304@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: FreeBSD Ports , Ade Lovett Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] GNU make 3.82 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:25:28 -0000 On Mar 10, 2011, at 22:02 , Doug Barton wrote: > But if you'd like to engage in a discussion rather than throwing = around ad hominem's and pointless "patches welcome" statements, maybe = you can show me why I'm wrong. How about working from the basis that perhaps, just perhaps, I'm = _right_, and show me why _I_ am wrong. After all, right now, I see me = and a few others doing actual _work_, and others merely taking potshots. By all means, show an alternate solution, one that assumes that some = project or another, which will be a part of the FreeBSD ports = collection, will _require_ GNU make 3.82, and we can go from there. Believe me, I'm willing to listen to well thought on, start to end, = include all possibility plans, but right now, all I'm seeing is "you're = wrong" without anything substantial to back it up so, at this point, I'd = like to focus on the issue at hand and get the work _done_. -aDe