Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 00:40:54 -0500 From: Coleman Kane <cokane@one.net> To: Evgeny Roubinchtein <eroubinc@u.washington.edu>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When does the 4.x branch go stable? Message-ID: <20000110004054.A1181@evil.2y.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.10.10001091547130.91952-100000@dante24.u.washington.edu>; from eroubinc@u.washington.edu on Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 06:50:22PM -0500 References: <20000109214046.7913BA54DB@netcom1.netcom.com> <Pine.A41.4.10.10001091547130.91952-100000@dante24.u.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Obviously, you have never tried to make world with the new egcs, it is almost impossible since there are many violations of ANSI C and C++ in the code right now. The kernel does, however, properly compile (minus some ext2fs crap). --cokane Evgeny Roubinchtein had the audacity to say: > On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Mike Harding wrote: > > > > >I'm interested in picking up the new gcc, but I was just curious as to > >when the 4.x branch becomes -STABLE, since the release is just around > >the corner. Also, that would be 4.x -STABLE, right? > > This is perhaps tangential, but if you wish to use gcc-2.95.2 for your > projects, why not install the "egcs" port (it's actually gcc-2.95.2)? > > > -- > Evgeny > > The computing field is always in need of new cliches. - Alan Perlis > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000110004054.A1181>