Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 14:15:56 +1000 (EST) From: Nicholas Charles Brawn <ncb05@uow.edu.au> To: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: freebsd vs linux (nfs) (fwd) Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980522141426.7243A-100000@wumpus.its.uow.edu.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I was pleased to see the ratings that freebsd received on this. Nick -- Email: ncb05@uow.edu.au - DE 30 33 D3 16 91 C8 8D A7 F8 70 03 B7 77 1A 2A http://rabble.uow.edu.au/~nick - public key available on request. Nicholas Brawn - Computer Science Undergraduate, University of Wollongong. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 14:41:58 -0500 (CDT) From: tip <tip@enteract.com> To: dc-stuff@dis.org Subject: freebsd vs linux (nfs) >from unix review's "performance computing" magazine, june 1998, pages 21-28, comparisons are on nt products vs various flavors of unix. for simplicity's sake, linux, bsdi, and freebsd are only mentioned here for comparison of bsd vs linux: NFS PROTOCOL SUPPORT -------------------- nfs v.2 nfs v.3 webnfs udp tcp udp tcp bsdi x x x x freebsd x x x x x linux x SUPPORT FOR ANCILLARY NFS PROTOCOLS ----------------------------------- RPC PORTMAPPER MOUNT PROTOCOL NETWORK LOCK MGR STATUS Over UDP Over TCP Over UDP Over TCP Over UDP Over TCP UDP TCP v2 v3 v4 v2 v3 v4 v1 v2 v3 v1 v2 v3 v1 v2 v3 v4 v1 v2 v3 v4 v1 v1 bsdi x x x x x x freebsd x x x x x x x x x x x linux x x x x again, i like both freebsd and linux, i'm slightly biased towards freebsd, just because of its superior networking and security over linux. thanx, - tip [ =-=-=-=-=-= preserve wildlife; pickle a squirrel today. =-=-=-=-=-= ] [ *&@$* tip - my evil twin is pit - mailto:tip@stopsmiling.com *&@~$* ] [ *&#%!$* don't trust that person in the mirror with anything *&!%#$* ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.96.980522141426.7243A-100000>