From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Apr 13 09:33:00 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA12807
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 13 Apr 1997 09:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etinc.com (et-gw-fr1.etinc.com [204.141.244.98])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA12802
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 13 Apr 1997 09:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dbws.etinc.com (db@dbws.etinc.com [204.141.95.130]) by etinc.com (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA22300; Sun, 13 Apr 1997 12:39:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970413123120.006cce20@etinc.com>
X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 12:31:25 -0400
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, jbryant@tfs.net
From: dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Subject: Re: question about X.25 drivers 
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

At 03:16 PM 4/12/97 -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>> Can anyone tell me anything about the BSD X.25 drivers, and whether or not
>> they are usable?
>
>They are not usable.  They may have been at one time, but they have
>rotted through disuse.
>
>> I am interested in possibly adding a AX.25 kernel-level driver...
>
>By all means!
>
>> This is the second time I have posted a message on this topic, and am
>> wondering if the first one was read?
>
>Probably, it's just that X.25 is about as popular and interesting a
>topic for most folks as a paper tape driver, hence the lack of
>response. :-)

Thats about as informed an opinion as I'd expect from unix geeks! :)

X.25 is the most popular protocol in the world...still. Sorry to break it
to you.

db