From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Apr 26 22:25: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C639D37B528 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 22:25:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA21730 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 07:25:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id HAA06080 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 07:25:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5C937B528; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 22:24:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA93185; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 23:24:37 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA50106; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 23:23:36 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200004270523.XAA50106@harmony.village.org> To: Greg Lehey Subject: Re: Where to discuss architectural issues (was: How about building modules along with the kernel? (was: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/syscons/fire fire_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/rain rain_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/warp warp_saver.c)) Cc: "Paul Richards.width" , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Chuck Robey , Robert Watson , FreeBSD Committers In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 27 Apr 2000 09:42:23 +0930." <20000427094223.F43932@freebie.lemis.com> References: <20000427094223.F43932@freebie.lemis.com> <20000426124729.D40207@freebie.lemis.com> <20000425234016.D1022@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000426164824.D43932@freebie.lemis.com> <3906CF74.1AEBFD09@originative.co.uk> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 23:23:36 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000427094223.F43932@freebie.lemis.com> Greg Lehey writes: : I think -arch is the right place. I'd just like to make sure that : -committers doesn't get left out, and the best way I can think of to : do that is to add -committers to the -arch list. No. Don't add commiters to -arch. Many of them are people that just do ports or don't care about global issues. If they did care, they should subscribe to -arch. -arch is the right place. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message