Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:49:51 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Jamin A. Brown" <jamin@gwi.net> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What's *really* up with RELENG_4_6 Message-ID: <20020830044950.GA43515@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.44.0208291634310.12390-100000@dargo.gwi.net> References: <20020829190352.GB32639@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.BSI.4.44.0208291634310.12390-100000@dargo.gwi.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 04:35:53PM -0400, Jamin A. Brown wrote: > > > Now, I was under the impression that RELENG_4_* branches were to cont= ain > > > only bug fixes since RELEASE. However, 4.6.2 and 4.6.1, both of which= have > > > showed up in RELENG_4_6, contain new features. > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Upon what are you basing this assertion? >=20 > I had thought, give normal development procedure, that 4.6.2 was cut from > stable, just like all other RELEASES. I also thought I remember STABLE > being frozen for 4.6.2-RELEASE, which would indicate that the new features > would have made it into 4.6.2. No, 4.6.2-RELEASE was a point release based off the RELENG_4_6 (therefore 4.6-RELEASE) branch. The only differences from 4.6-RELEASE were bugfixes, as noted explicitly in the release notes. Kris --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9bvltWry0BWjoQKURApn0AJ9dqswxcychSjmrBnDOjs01beH4XwCeIX79 tqi/E+A/eXZlZhl7A/+PUfc= =K2XK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020830044950.GA43515>