From owner-freebsd-java@freebsd.org  Wed Mar 15 15:52:20 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9817D0D346
 for <freebsd-java@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:52:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk)
Received: from mx0.gid.co.uk (mx0.gid.co.uk [194.32.164.250])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 546C01386
 for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:52:19 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk)
Received: from [194.32.164.15] ([194.32.164.15])
 by mx0.gid.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id v2FFqBqn062724;
 Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:52:11 GMT (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: Needle in the haystack: same Java code on two identical machines,
 one passes one fails
From: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <68644224DA0DE64CA5A49838ED219A0425C0F0EA@DEFTHW99EJ5MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:52:12 +0000
Cc: "freebsd-java@freebsd.org" <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B49D69D5-F3FD-4A44-A416-FADF8CF86C69@gid.co.uk>
References: <68644224DA0DE64CA5A49838ED219A0425C0F0EA@DEFTHW99EJ5MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
To: "Osipov, Michael" <michael.osipov@siemens.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-java>,
 <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
 <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:52:20 -0000

Hi,


> On 15 Mar 2017, at 14:50, Osipov, Michael <michael.osipov@siemens.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> Hi folks,
>=20
> I am currently experiencing a stdio issue on a FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE box =
at work where
> another, identical box, works flawlessly as well as other test boxes =
in a VM or on real
> hardware from 9.3-STABLE to 11.0-STABLE.
>=20
> Let's stick to the two identical boxes at work for now, both are two =
identical HPE
> servers (Xeon CPUs, RAM 4 GiB) running 10.3-STABLE, both base systems =
are
> configured the same way. Software from ports installed is slightly =
different.
>=20
> faulty box:
> FreeBSD blnn719x.ww004.siemens.net 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #0 =
r310805: Fri Dec 30 11:29:53 CET 2016     =
root@blnn719x.ww004.siemens.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BLNN719X  i386
>=20
> working box:
> FreeBSD blnn714x.ww004.siemens.net 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #0 =
r310632: Tue Dec 27 18:58:32 CET 2016     =
root@blnn714x.ww004.siemens.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BLNN714X  i386 =
[etc]

Well at a quick look, there are changes between r310632 and r310805 that =
might explain what you are seeing.


--
Bob Bishop
rb@gid.co.uk