From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Nov 28 9:38:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from trinity.skynet.be (trinity.skynet.be [195.238.2.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3267837B400 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:38:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by trinity.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D05D180FC; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 18:38:14 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@195.238.1.45 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 18:31:57 +0100 To: , chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Netbsd advances... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 11:38 AM -0500 2000/11/28, wrote: > UBC code integrated into NetBSD-current (27 Nov) (top) > > Chuck Silvers has integrated the Unified Buffer Cache project code > into NetBSD-current. To build a new -current kernel from an existing > kernel configuration file, you'll want to remove any settings for > "BUFCACHE", "NBUF", or "BUFPAGES", and let the size of the buffer cache go > back to the default. After that, you'll need to rerun config, and then you > can build away. This brings up a good question -- does FreeBSD have a unified buffer cache? If not, is there a particular reason why? -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message