From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 19 05:11:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819521065680 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 05:11:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mehmasarja@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f105.google.com (mail-pz0-f105.google.com [209.85.222.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D118FC15 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 05:11:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mehmasarja@gmail.com) Received: by pzk3 with SMTP id 3so2473884pzk.3 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 22:11:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=q7dCbA66IxT9Znr2dBL0OBOAxVkQMQL+Cuc3xaoNf8I=; b=SCXEvjQwQQKJRdN0EWyPgDDA7bgNGftqfWPaERWLKYMFSbNAptkVEUGg3RZA6zsc2a 5S8tzm1FAY1y4QeeoxR+CZUhU+dIJ7sj1BT0RSBkK8Vub/LMIwe0UnnXMv6D0uCb1psg XMtcEnrQiOQDocgJBY3am+UWzPTnXBbFdYfGg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=p6Xy7z9N7VX6hPl0qcQG2dj2Z581t9o4jhmE2N36QWV/9Uqi4jIujgBqaQk9NJJz44 n8srm5vT7jy+tje/0AEkWCInfq3Qnm7Eq67qWStCFmZvLVcccfxSEPCb/YjA6yD2Go2R wGpTjGO7YbmyM5/IN/LkTOVRaaeqCBL4Qr7aU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.113.16 with SMTP id l16mr12796349wac.164.1242709872876; Mon, 18 May 2009 22:11:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200905181114.24507.milu@dat.pl> References: <200905181114.24507.milu@dat.pl> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:11:12 -0700 Message-ID: From: mehma sarja To: Maciej Milewski Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ysidhu@ucolick.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Testing new firewall to replace operational firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 05:11:13 -0000 Maciej, Thanks for answering one question. Now, does anyone know anything about "modulated state" running on tandem firewalls causing problems? Yudhvir =3D=3D=3D 2009/5/18 Maciej Milewski > Monday 18 May 2009 08:20:40 mehma sarja napisa=B3(a): > > SECOND > > Are the "flags S/SA" altq functions? Because, as I said before, the new > > firewall is FreeBSD GENERIC kernel with altq not compiled in. > No, they aren't as far as I know. Altq is a mechanism using for > queuing/traffic shaping. If you don't compile it it just can't be used. F= or > more info please look at PF FAQ or pf manual. > > > S/SA is from flags and means SYN and ACK. > Handbook says "FreeBSD 7.X -- PF is at OpenBSD 4.1" So this option (flags > S/SA) is set by default. If you omit it in config it will be set. > > > > Best Regards, > Maciej Milewski >