From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 24 00:04:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68941065672 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:04:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D668FC19 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.74]) by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xuHB1e0021bwxycA304nZ9; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:04:47 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id y04l1e00446zqiB8e04mFQ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:04:46 +0000 Message-ID: <4C730C9C.2000506@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:04:44 -0700 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100819 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glen Barber References: <4C72977B.9060104@comcast.net> <4C72B37D.2020504@comcast.net> <4C72B51C.8020901@gmail.com> <4C72B6EE.6050205@gmail.com> <4C72B8A3.2@comcast.net> <4C72E620.8070007@comcast.net> <4C72ED4D.9060909@comcast.net> <4C72F6DC.1040009@gmail.com> <4C72FDC0.5080308@comcast.net> <4C730535.8080707@gmail.com> <4C7309E3.50202@comcast.net> <4C730B74.3080103@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C730B74.3080103@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Xorg Redux X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:04:47 -0000 On 08/23/10 16:59, Glen Barber wrote: > On 8/23/10 7:53 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote: >>> First, let's try the "vesa" thing. >>> >> Eureka! I changed Driver to "vesa" in both of the "Device" sections and >> X now loads. I doubt that "vesa" is the ideal entry in the >> configuration, but at this point I'm not going to complain. >> > Great. It looks like the intel driver is the problem then. vesa will > work, but I'd expect it will perform suboptimal, comparatively. Are you > interested in helping find out what the real problem is? > Definitely! I have time on my hands, and I love learning about this system.