Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 22:33:18 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com>, toolchain@FreeBSD.org, Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru>, FreeBSD Current <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: GCC withdraw Message-ID: <5218C42E.1070901@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <DC41B4BD-159A-408B-804A-0230F3E0E52B@FreeBSD.org> References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <5217413A.9080105@passap.ru> <20130823111647.GT2951@home.opsec.eu> <521745F2.8050607@passap.ru> <CAOFF%2BZ3vbOgMO7T-BKZnhKte6=rFoGcdYcft5kpAgNH2my1JKg@mail.gmail.com> <DC41B4BD-159A-408B-804A-0230F3E0E52B@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/24/13 7:19 PM, David Chisnall wrote: > On 24 Aug 2013, at 11:30, "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So I vote, let's not give ourselves the burden of "lugging" dead weight in >> base >> for another 5 years. (in 2017 do we still want to be worrying about gcc in >> base?) > Perhaps more to the point, in 2017 do we want to be responsible for maintaining a fork of a 2007 release of gcc and libstdc++? The same work needs to be done no matter where it is.. there is no saving in moving it, and a lot of hassle.. leave the damned thing alone and be thankful that we have switched to clang by default! don't over-reach your successes. > > David > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5218C42E.1070901>