From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 27 18:13:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0362106564A for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from os@sfedu.ru) Received: from mail.r61.net (mail.r61.net [195.208.245.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582C78FC17 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from os@sfedu.ru) Received: from mind.local (os.adsl.r61.net [195.208.243.95]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.r61.net (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n6RID9tH015473 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:13:10 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from os@sfedu.ru) X-Authentication-Warning: asterix.r61.net: Host os.adsl.r61.net [195.208.243.95] claimed to be mind.local Message-ID: <4A6DEE30.6000108@sfedu.ru> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:13:04 +0400 From: Oleg Sharoyko User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <1248704237.96833.127.camel@brain.cc.rsu.ru> <4A6DE356.6040006@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <4A6DE356.6040006@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wrong outgoing interface with multiple routing tables X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:13:18 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: >> r61net-fbsdhost-1, / # setfib 1 /usr/sbin/sshd -o 'ListenAddress >> 195.208.245.229:2222' -D > > Are you running this from inetd?. (doesnt look like it) No, I run this from shell merely for test purposes. First I tried to start sshd in a usual way in a jail, but came to this simple test example. > btw is it 1 or -1? or -F 1? > I can't remember if I supported just '1'. According to manual page it works either way and it does indeed. > try adding a '-' on the command > and get back to me. The same results. -- Oleg