From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 12 15:10:06 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CBF16A4CE
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 12 May 2005 15:10:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB89B43D62
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 12 May 2005 15:10:05 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4CFA5mV017168
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 May 2005 15:10:05 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j4CFA57E017167;
	Thu, 12 May 2005 15:10:05 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 15:10:05 GMT
Message-Id: <200505121510.j4CFA57E017167@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Jan Srzednicki <w@expro.pl>
Subject: Re: kern/80322: TCP socket support broken on a busy port
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Jan Srzednicki <w@expro.pl>
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 15:10:06 -0000

The following reply was made to PR kern/80322; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jan Srzednicki <w@expro.pl>
To: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/80322: TCP socket support broken on a busy port
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 17:01:29 +0200

 On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 09:24:38AM -0700, Bill Fenner wrote:
 > 
 > Are you using SO_REUSEADDR (in both the process that dies and
 > the new process that tries to bind)?  Does netstat show the socket
 > in TIME_WAIT?
 
 OK, I finally managed to reproduce that. Yes, netstat indeed shows the
 socket in TIME_WAIT state with one connection, both queues empty. After
 this connection has timeouted, I can bind to the port as normal.
 
 -- 
 Jan Srzednicki
 w@expro.pl