Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 08:51:49 +0200 (MET DST) From: sos@FreeBSD.org To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Cc: terry@lambert.org, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Linux emulation, gethostid() Message-ID: <199610240651.IAA05144@ra.dkuug.dk> In-Reply-To: <199610240215.LAA04187@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Oct 24, 96 11:45:15 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Michael Smith who wrote: > > Terry Lambert stands accused of saying: > > > > > > Do we want an ioctl to get the hardware address? If not, any > > > suggestions on a _tidy_ way to get it? > > > > Check the list archives. The Mathematica "correct method" included > > patches to implement the interface without the kernel grubbing. I > > am suprised that the patches were not integrated. > > You mean this one? I'm not surprised : > > ] Insert into linux_ioctl, in linux_ioctl.c, inside the first switch. > ] > ] case 0x8927: > ] hwaddr[0]=0x00; > ] hwaddr[1]=0x00; > ] hwaddr[2]=0xc0; > ] hwaddr[3]=0x27; > ] hwaddr[4]=0xe5; > ] hwaddr[5]=0x66; > ] return copyout((caddr_t)hwaddr, (caddr_t)args->arg,6); > ] > > No other messages on the subject appear to contain any code at all, but > I'll pester Andrew Gallatin and see if he finished the issue. OK, so I guess I have to look after my kid again right ?? I'll see what I can come up with... -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Soren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team So much code to hack -- so little time.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610240651.IAA05144>