From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 21 12: 1:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76E515540 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 12:01:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA30513; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 11:59:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 11:59:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199907211859.LAA30513@apollo.backplane.com> To: Amancio Hasty Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Base Kerberos 5 support? References: <199907211840.LAA05382@rah.star-gate.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :Howdy , : :I noticed this : : :http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/server/Deploy/security/MitKerb.asp : :Microsoft claims that they are going to be compatible with MIT Kerberos 5 :or so the story goes 8) : :I noticed that the based kerberized tools in FreeBSD are for Kerberos IV... : :I installed Kerberos 5 port on my system and it appears to work except :in multi-homed server: I get replay dispatch errors ... : :My work around was simply to start moving my network services to a :a box which I don't use often and it has a single interface which is okay :and right for internal network services such as kerberos . : : Cheers : Amancio Hasty Kerberos 5 is currently a port, /usr/ports/security/krb5. I would love to see krb 5 made part of the standard distribution. BEST has been using it for several years now with no problems and I believe that it is a whole lot easier to administrate then krb 4. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message